<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for brunerd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brunerd.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog</link>
	<description>curly haired mac nerd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tearing apart OpinionSpy by SG</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/2010/06/03/tearing-apart-opinionspy/comment-page-1/#comment-6393</link>
		<dc:creator>SG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?p=188#comment-6393</guid>
		<description>Typo!  Sorry everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo!  Sorry everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tearing apart OpinionSpy by SG</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/2010/06/03/tearing-apart-opinionspy/comment-page-1/#comment-6392</link>
		<dc:creator>SG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?p=188#comment-6392</guid>
		<description>What if they hadn&#039;t been up front about it in their license?  There could be many apps spying without being noticed.  To this group, they&#039;re not even breaking the law - it&#039;s all right their in the eula.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if they hadn&#8217;t been up front about it in their license?  There could be many apps spying without being noticed.  To this group, they&#8217;re not even breaking the law &#8211; it&#8217;s all right their in the eula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finder&#8217;s Nasty Inherited ACL Bug (aka Error -41) by Hank Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/2011/03/22/finders-nasty-inherited-acl-bug-aka-error-41/comment-page-1/#comment-6286</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?p=304#comment-6286</guid>
		<description>&gt; fixed in Lion!

Apparently not for those migrating files from older Macs/Systems.  I got a mess when I tried, then looked for it and found many comments/questions at Apple&#039;s support area about permission folders, authorizations needed to copy files or trash files, and on and on.  Nobody seems to know for sure what&#039;s up with this yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; fixed in Lion!</p>
<p>Apparently not for those migrating files from older Macs/Systems.  I got a mess when I tried, then looked for it and found many comments/questions at Apple&#8217;s support area about permission folders, authorizations needed to copy files or trash files, and on and on.  Nobody seems to know for sure what&#8217;s up with this yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/software/comment-page-1/#comment-6261</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?page_id=332#comment-6261</guid>
		<description>Never mind.  Today it works.  Odd.  Thanks, its great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind.  Today it works.  Odd.  Thanks, its great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/software/comment-page-1/#comment-6259</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?page_id=332#comment-6259</guid>
		<description>I like your widget so I tried myXProtectStatus but it gives an error.  &#039;Can&#039;t make &quot;Oct&quot; into type integer&#039;  I am running Mac OS X 10.7.2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your widget so I tried myXProtectStatus but it gives an error.  &#8216;Can&#8217;t make &#8220;Oct&#8221; into type integer&#8217;  I am running Mac OS X 10.7.2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple Keyboard A1243 Disassembly by Denna</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/2009/08/25/apple-keyboard-a1243-disassembly/comment-page-1/#comment-6258</link>
		<dc:creator>Denna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?p=130#comment-6258</guid>
		<description>Good post. Its realy nice. More information help me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. Its realy nice. More information help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finder&#8217;s Nasty Inherited ACL Bug (aka Error -41) by Lorenzo</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/2011/03/22/finders-nasty-inherited-acl-bug-aka-error-41/comment-page-1/#comment-6237</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?p=304#comment-6237</guid>
		<description>10.6.8 has fixed this issue for us.
Note: we had to update both clients and Metadatacontroller server to 10.6.8 for solving the problem.

WOW: we can now copy files and folders present on the Apple Xsan volume from a 10.6.8 Xsan client and ACLs do not get duplicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10.6.8 has fixed this issue for us.<br />
Note: we had to update both clients and Metadatacontroller server to 10.6.8 for solving the problem.</p>
<p>WOW: we can now copy files and folders present on the Apple Xsan volume from a 10.6.8 Xsan client and ACLs do not get duplicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lion&#8217;s grey sidebar is a Jedi mind trick by Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/2011/09/27/lions-grey-sidebar-is-a-jedi-mind-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-6226</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?p=415#comment-6226</guid>
		<description>&gt; Finder tells you to correct it’s permissions using Finder, which doesn’t offer that ability

Very helpful. bwk&#039;s first tutorial on building Unix scripts doesn&#039;t work on OS X. Brilliant.

&gt; But have pity and empathy on the unwashed masses

It&#039;s not about them. It&#039;s about the pros who buy our stuff. We all know the difference. But Apple deliberately ignore programmer/admin needs. They&#039;ll never get the enterprise without that. And currently they&#039;re like a 16yo girl who tells you &#039;I think I&#039;m gonna dump Robbie Williams&#039;.

&gt; QuickLook, CoverFlow, Spotlight, and colored folders

Yes. That&#039;s not important to us. We just want to go in and do surgery. Not the same thing.

&gt; but woe to them if they double clicked an app bundle in Xfile

Either that or having to invoke a context menu and &#039;Show Package Contents&#039;. The app bundle *is* a directory and that definition can change at any time. And lo and behold: that directory has files in it!

&gt; but I just don’t have your righteous zeal

It&#039;s not about zeal. It&#039;s about trying to get the job done. Again: we would never have written those tools if we didn&#039;t need them. The cold shower when migrating to OS X ten years ago was that they had *nothing*.

Remember WINFILE? The &#039;advanced&#039; PROGMAN for Windows? Default that was a kiddie toy. Play with it enough and you could turn it into a dynamo. But you had to tinker with it to get it that far. You can&#039;t do that with Apple tools. Pros are left out in the cold. We&#039;re pros and we needed better; our clients do too. They&#039;re not your &#039;unwashed masses&#039;. Not at all.

&gt; Of course, it’s the Resource fork thumbnail that is saved in there, that’ll get stripped when they upload it, but Finder isn’t letting them know that!

Actually it&#039;s an *extended attribute* today. Big step forward for 10.4 in 2005. And not worrying about that extra baggage for ordinary users is fine - but they offer no alternative for the pros. For those who need to know.

If you can see it from the command line, you should be able to see it from the graphical interface. And that&#039;s the irony: MSFT announced the end of the command line, something Apple never had, then Apple introduced it.

And there&#039;s nothing wrong with the command line. For batch processing it&#039;s the only way to go. What *is* wrong is that Apple so many times - Apple of all companies - offer the pros no alternative. Fumbling in the dark with a command line for a pro is a nightmare. You don&#039;t have the overview. The one thing that really sells the GUI for a pro is the file management. You can see everything at once. Apple don&#039;t have that. Other platforms target both end users and pros. Apple are alone in targeting only the end users and ignoring the pros. No wonder the enterprise walked away. NeXT systems were never like that.

&gt; I can’t think of anything more impure than crap!

Now you&#039;re being scatological. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Finder tells you to correct it’s permissions using Finder, which doesn’t offer that ability</p>
<p>Very helpful. bwk&#8217;s first tutorial on building Unix scripts doesn&#8217;t work on OS X. Brilliant.</p>
<p>&gt; But have pity and empathy on the unwashed masses</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about them. It&#8217;s about the pros who buy our stuff. We all know the difference. But Apple deliberately ignore programmer/admin needs. They&#8217;ll never get the enterprise without that. And currently they&#8217;re like a 16yo girl who tells you &#8216;I think I&#8217;m gonna dump Robbie Williams&#8217;.</p>
<p>&gt; QuickLook, CoverFlow, Spotlight, and colored folders</p>
<p>Yes. That&#8217;s not important to us. We just want to go in and do surgery. Not the same thing.</p>
<p>&gt; but woe to them if they double clicked an app bundle in Xfile</p>
<p>Either that or having to invoke a context menu and &#8216;Show Package Contents&#8217;. The app bundle *is* a directory and that definition can change at any time. And lo and behold: that directory has files in it!</p>
<p>&gt; but I just don’t have your righteous zeal</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about zeal. It&#8217;s about trying to get the job done. Again: we would never have written those tools if we didn&#8217;t need them. The cold shower when migrating to OS X ten years ago was that they had *nothing*.</p>
<p>Remember WINFILE? The &#8216;advanced&#8217; PROGMAN for Windows? Default that was a kiddie toy. Play with it enough and you could turn it into a dynamo. But you had to tinker with it to get it that far. You can&#8217;t do that with Apple tools. Pros are left out in the cold. We&#8217;re pros and we needed better; our clients do too. They&#8217;re not your &#8216;unwashed masses&#8217;. Not at all.</p>
<p>&gt; Of course, it’s the Resource fork thumbnail that is saved in there, that’ll get stripped when they upload it, but Finder isn’t letting them know that!</p>
<p>Actually it&#8217;s an *extended attribute* today. Big step forward for 10.4 in 2005. And not worrying about that extra baggage for ordinary users is fine &#8211; but they offer no alternative for the pros. For those who need to know.</p>
<p>If you can see it from the command line, you should be able to see it from the graphical interface. And that&#8217;s the irony: MSFT announced the end of the command line, something Apple never had, then Apple introduced it.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s nothing wrong with the command line. For batch processing it&#8217;s the only way to go. What *is* wrong is that Apple so many times &#8211; Apple of all companies &#8211; offer the pros no alternative. Fumbling in the dark with a command line for a pro is a nightmare. You don&#8217;t have the overview. The one thing that really sells the GUI for a pro is the file management. You can see everything at once. Apple don&#8217;t have that. Other platforms target both end users and pros. Apple are alone in targeting only the end users and ignoring the pros. No wonder the enterprise walked away. NeXT systems were never like that.</p>
<p>&gt; I can’t think of anything more impure than crap!</p>
<p>Now you&#8217;re being scatological. <img src='http://www.brunerd.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lion&#8217;s grey sidebar is a Jedi mind trick by brunerd</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/2011/09/27/lions-grey-sidebar-is-a-jedi-mind-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-6225</link>
		<dc:creator>brunerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?p=415#comment-6225</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I think &quot;not running crap&quot;  does equal &quot;purism&quot; :D
I can&#039;t think of anything more impure than crap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I think &#8220;not running crap&#8221;  does equal &#8220;purism&#8221; <img src='http://www.brunerd.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I can&#8217;t think of anything more impure than crap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lion&#8217;s grey sidebar is a Jedi mind trick by brunerd</title>
		<link>http://www.brunerd.com/blog/2011/09/27/lions-grey-sidebar-is-a-jedi-mind-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator>brunerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunerd.com/blog/?p=415#comment-6224</guid>
		<description>Well of course the Finder should Just Work™. File permissions is so dumbed down it is laughable (cry-able maybe), for instance when you make a .command file from Textedit and then try to run it, the Finder tells you to correct it&#039;s permissions using Finder, which doesn&#039;t offer that ability! But have pity and empathy on the unwashed masses, Rick. Not everyone needs the power of XFile, I love it the thorough information you can get from it and the other ACP tools, but most folks that I support and who own a Mac want the features of Finder: QuickLook, CoverFlow, Spotlight, and colored folders (they had to work on that a bit didn&#039;t they ;) but woe to them if they double clicked an app bundle in Xfile, it&#039;d just drill into it rather than launch it, game over, they would be baffled. Yes, I know it&#039;s Command-Enter, but that&#039;s in not their muscle memory, these mere mortals don&#039;t need to work at such a level... although, your point about file sizes is true, I&#039;ve gotten quite a few calls from web folks who are trying to get files to a certain size only to be baffled when Finder seemingly inflates the size after a save. Of course, it&#039;s the Resource fork thumbnail that is saved in there, that&#039;ll get stripped when they upload it, but Finder isn&#039;t letting them know that!

So I know what you mean, I get where you&#039;re coming from, and I respectfully see your points -- but I just don&#039;t have your righteous zeal, keep up the good fight :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well of course the Finder should Just Work™. File permissions is so dumbed down it is laughable (cry-able maybe), for instance when you make a .command file from Textedit and then try to run it, the Finder tells you to correct it&#8217;s permissions using Finder, which doesn&#8217;t offer that ability! But have pity and empathy on the unwashed masses, Rick. Not everyone needs the power of XFile, I love it the thorough information you can get from it and the other ACP tools, but most folks that I support and who own a Mac want the features of Finder: QuickLook, CoverFlow, Spotlight, and colored folders (they had to work on that a bit didn&#8217;t they <img src='http://www.brunerd.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  but woe to them if they double clicked an app bundle in Xfile, it&#8217;d just drill into it rather than launch it, game over, they would be baffled. Yes, I know it&#8217;s Command-Enter, but that&#8217;s in not their muscle memory, these mere mortals don&#8217;t need to work at such a level&#8230; although, your point about file sizes is true, I&#8217;ve gotten quite a few calls from web folks who are trying to get files to a certain size only to be baffled when Finder seemingly inflates the size after a save. Of course, it&#8217;s the Resource fork thumbnail that is saved in there, that&#8217;ll get stripped when they upload it, but Finder isn&#8217;t letting them know that!</p>
<p>So I know what you mean, I get where you&#8217;re coming from, and I respectfully see your points &#8212; but I just don&#8217;t have your righteous zeal, keep up the good fight <img src='http://www.brunerd.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

